The near-term treatments can help balance the budget in the short-term. But, if local governments are going to transform their financial position for the better, then they need long-term treatments too.

The Financial Foundations

First, consider the foundations of how your local government operates. Technical strategies to improve financial condition won’t work well or at all if the foundations are not strong. The foundation consists of leadership strategies and the design of institutions.

Leadership Strategies

Local government leaders must inspire pride, loyalty, and enthusiasm so that followers will want to support a strong financial foundation for the local government. Below are examples key leadership strategies. You can learn more about these at GFOA’s Financial Foundations for Thriving Communities:

  • Develop an inspiring, shared vision for the community in order to convince stakeholders of the benefits of working together for a strong financial foundation and thriving community.
  • Build long time horizons into fiscal planning to circumvent short-term thinking that may have adverse consequences in the long run.
  • Help people recognize their shared interest in a financially healthy local government by creating open communication between people.
  • Make a concerted effort to improve trust. Trust is essential for a local government to perform at its best, to provide high-quality services, and to have a strong financial foundation.
  • Keep key stakeholders and employees engaged in the decision-making process. 
  • Use formal and informal power to provide oversight, reinforce financially constructive behavior, and to encourage collaborative behaviors through organizational culture.

 Institutional Design

Institutions provide the “rules of the game” for people within local government to work together for a strong financial future; the context in which the leadership strategies operate; and continuity of good financial practices through changes in leadership. Below are examples key institutional designs. You can learn more about these at GFOA’s Financial Foundations for Thriving Communities:

  • Develop new and better approaches to public engagement. The public will be more likely to sustain it when it is engaged in deciding how  the budget will be used.
  • Form and maintain relationships with other public, non-private, and private organizations in order to direct more resources and capabilities to solving pressing community challenges.
  • Financial policies should be used to define boundaries around who shares and controls public resources and how resources can be used.
  • Create a system to monitor the process of financial decision-making and the outcomes of those decisions.
  • Develop a system of rewards and penalties that apply a lighter touch at first, and only resorts to weightier options in more extreme circumstances.
  • Be clear about where money comes from and where it goes.
  • Develop decision-making systems that are perceived to be fair by the participants.
  • Develop systems to manage relationships with higher levels of governments that can influence the local government’s financial position.

Technical Treatments

There are many technical things that local governments can do to reduce costs or strengthen their tax base over the long-term. Below is a list of potential treatments. You can use Step 6 – Detailed Diagnosis to help you judge which ones might be most important for you.

Control Employee Benefits Costs

Contain Employee Health Care Costs.  Local governments need to design their employee health plans to contain costs.  There are a number of strategies that local governments can use to contain health care cost, including self-insurance and high deductible health plans.

Reform Pensions. Pension liabilities are essentially a form of “bad debt” that hobbles a local government’s ability to provide the community’s desired mix of tax and services. Local governments can take steps to address this problem.

Budget Better

Don’t Budget Incrementally. A traditional, incremental budget makes marginal changes in spending from year to year. It impedes the major reform local government needs to make a transformation. There are methods of budgeting that are not incremental including priority-based budgeting and zero-base budgeting.  Governments have also been successful with other approaches that use performance data, prioritize spending, evaluate return on investment, or better align spending with need/priority.

Ensure Capital Assets are Affordable Now and in the Long-Term.  A capital planning and budgeting process must produce investment decisions where both the initial acquisition and long-term maintenance obligation of capital assets are found to be affordable before the investment is made. Also, large capital projects are often financed with debt. Debt can be a great way to finance capital assets, but must be used responsibly. A debt policy that describes locally imposed self-limitations on the use of debt can make sure it is used responsibility. 

Transform Government Services

Stop or Reduce Lower Priority Services.  Due to the incremental budgeting approach, local governments may continue to offer a service that is no longer affordable or relevant to the community’s needs. Local governments should inventory the services they offer and then decide which ones they can continue to provide.

Shift from Remediation to Prevention.  Remediation is often much more expensive than prevention. There are many examples of how this can shift be done in local government. One example with particular relevance the finance office is life-cycle costing of assets. This allows local governments to focus maintenance on assets at the point before they begin to deteriorate more rapidly and become increasingly expensive to repair.

Improve / Simplify Work Process.  Lean process improvement (or comparable methods) can be used to eliminate waste by changing the way work is done. This could involve smart investments in technology or simply changing the way work is done. Careful planning is needed to realize actual cash savings from process improvement. This is because time saved from process improvement often gets filled with other activities.

Overcome the Limits of Local Government Fragmentation.  The number of local governments combined with the lack of coordination between them is sometimes referred to as local government fragmentation. Is there is too much fragmentation in local government and could public funds be better used if there was less fragmentation? Research shows that consolidating multiple local governments into one larger local government rarely saves money. A better strategy is to improve coordination where it offers the most value. Examples of strategy in the vein include regionalization, partnering with non-profits and the private sector to achieve community goals, and investigating opportunities to share day-to-day services with other organizations.

More Financially Savvy Community Development

Tame the Use of Economic Development Incentives. Empirical research suggests that more than 75 percent of new jobs in an area would have been created locally without an added incentive.  For this reason, and others, most incentives are all cost and no benefit. Therefore, local governments could benefit by reforming their use of economic development incentives.

Choose Financially Sustainable Land Use Patterns. Land use planning decisions are usually made without regard to the long-term financial impacts on the local government budget. Therefore, local government should develop a capacity to analyze the true financial impacts of land use decisions. That provides the basis for making choices about land use that will better support the local government’s long-term financial health.