Materiality Mondays: The 5-Step Framework and Case Studies

Accounting and Financial Reporting, Rethinking Financial Reporting

Materiality Mondays: The 5-Step Framework and Case Studies

Event Type: eLearning Course

Dates and Times

  • June 8, 2026 1 - 2 p.m. ET

  • June 15, 2026 1 - 2 p.m. ET

Speakers

Michele Mark Levine, Shayne Kavanagh, Jennifer Becker, and Jason Al-Imam


Event Details

Field of Study: Accounting (Governmental)

Level: Overview

Credits: 2

Prerequisite: None

Status: This event has availability.

Details

These webinars equip finance professionals to move beyond "exhaustive precision" toward "decision-useful accuracy." By following GFOA’s "Rethinking" framework, governments can significantly reduce administrative burdens—such as tracking hundreds of low-value assets or leases—while focusing resources on information that truly impacts public and auditor decisions. The course reframes materiality from a narrow compliance calculation into a governance-driven process that helps governments produce materially accurate, decision-useful financial reports with less low-value effort.

The first webinar, based on GFOA’s Materiality as a Process: What Really Counts, will introduce a systematic approach to determining what truly belongs in your financial reports. Participants will learn how to shift their mindset from compliance-only to a value-based evaluation of financial data.

The second webinar uses the City of Newport Beach and Sweet Grass County case studies to show the “Materiality as a Process” framework in action. The first case study shows how the City analyzed its lease portfolio using the Pareto Principle to eliminate the tracking of 51 immaterial leases, saving 50 staff hours during year-end close.

Further, another case study reviews how the County revised its entire capital asset policy. Using the Lorenz Curve to provide support to estimate that 20% of assets often account for 75% of reported value, proving support for allowing for much higher capitalization thresholds.

Who Will Benefit

  • Government finance teams seeking auditor-defensible materiality decisions with less effort.

Learning Objectives

  1. Define the difference between accuracy and precision and its impact on financial reporting workload.
  2. Identify qualitative "barriers" (legal, political, auditor) that may override a purely quantitative materiality decision.
  3. Understand the cumulative impact test to ensure multiple immaterial omissions do not aggregate into a material misstatement.
  4. internal documentation that makes these professional judgments defensible during an independent audit.
  5. Analyze a dataset using the Pareto Principle (80/20 rule) to identify the "vital few" high-value items.
  6. Evaluate the "Goldilocks Zone" where the value of information to the user is highest relative to the cost of production.
  7. Navigate auditor collaboration regarding the "Clearly Trivial Threshold" (CTT) and uncorrected misstatements.
  8. Utilize a Lorenz Curve to visualize the uneven distribution of value across a capital asset schedule.

Member Price: $105.00

Non-Member Price: $210.00

Register