Rethinking Public Engagement Summit

Rethinking Public Engagement Summit

This summit is part of GFOA's Rethinking Budgeting initiative.

About the Summit

GFOA's Rethinking Public Engagement Summit was held November 7-10. Featuring nearly 20 sessions, the summit brought together academics, researchers, civic technology experts, and local government practitioners from across the globe to finally begin to rethink public engagement.

Watch Summit Sessions

Note: Videos have been edited for brevity and full versions are available on GFOA's Learning Management System for summit registrants to watch.

Defining the Problem

This 50-minute session will introduce the four forces that call for Rethinking Public Engagement. 

https://www.gfoa.org/rethinking-public-engagement-summit

Engaging with Complexity: Adapting Democratic Discourse to Complex Problems

Many of the challenges that most inspire the passion of citizens are complex problems. Complex problems pose a challenge to public engagement. Because they defy easy answers, they contribute to a sense of cynicism about what collective action, through government, can…

Sense-making: Navigating the Information Tsunami

The “information tsunami” that buffets our society challenges our ability to make sense of the world around us. The mechanisms for expressing and gathering opinions have exploded, but our ability to make sense of them and create mutual understanding have significantly…

Rights and Responsibilities: Finding the Balance for a Renewal of Citizenship

Citizens have rights but also responsibilities to uphold a democratic government that guarantees those rights. In recent years, there has been more emphasis on individual rights and less on the collective responsibility to maintain the system that guarantees those rights. This can result in…

Dealing with Disrupters: Stemming the Rising Tide of "Bad Actors" in Public Engagement

Bad actors don’t play by the rules of democratic discourse. They disrupt public engagement, eschew compromise, and generally impede productive conversation. However, not all bad actors are the…

Designing Engaging Institutions: Critical Capacities for Democratic Discourse in Local Governments

High quality democratic decisions depend on high quality democratic institutions. Institutions ensure that the capacity for public engagement is on-going. But what are the capacities local governments need? And who should provide those …

Going from the Politics of Public Cynicism to the Politics of Co-Creation

The politics of cynicism results when complex problems meet with a delegitimized government and a public fractured into competing groups. The politics of cynicism rejects compromise as tantamount to capitulation, making it difficult to reconcile or transcend competing interests. Local…

Designing Public Engagement to Work for Public Officials

Public officials stand to gain a lot from high quality public engagement, but it won’t go far if officials are not supportive of it. Some officials have concerns with public engagement that prevent them from embracing…

Public Engagement in the Age of Anti Expertise

Skepticism of expertise is widespread, meaning that public is less likely to defer to expertise of local government officials. Instead, they bring their own research to public meetings and elevate lived experience over expert opinion. Public engagement must be designed…

Competing with Netflix: Making Democracy Fun

The public has more things competing for their attention than ever before. Local government has to compete for attention in order for people to engage. Fortunately, much has been learned in recent years about how to make things…

Defining Reality: Misinformation, Disinformation and Public Engagement

Today’s information environment allows people to define their own reality. Bad actors complicate this through pollution of the information environment with mis- or disinformation. Yet some common understanding of the issues the community faces is necessary for productive…

Participatory Budgeting and Civic Tech

Participatory budgeting is a groundbreaking format of public engagement. It allows citizens either to contribute in defining budget priorities of their municipality, or to propose projects which will benefit the entire community. In this talk, we explore the main advantages and the challenges of…

Why Budget Engagement Should be Hard

When it comes to engaging the public on the budget the goal should be that by the time residents are done they should think to themselves, “this is hard.” Successful engagement puts residents in the shoes of decision makers and lets them weigh tough tradeoffs that take costs and available resources…

Blockchain and its Potential for Civic Technology

Social innovation communities worldwide have recently focused on local governance and blockchain technologies. In this panel, we explore the intersections of these trends, highlighting how we might apply blockchain technologies to make cities stronger. These ideas range from…

An Intro to the Science of Collective Intelligence

This session is intended for people who are not familiar with the concept of collective intelligence. We will review examples of collective intelligence that are found in nature and use them to learn …

Citizen Trust and Technology

Like many institutions, city governments are experiencing a trust deficit, making it difficult to deliver services. As a result, many are deploying digital tools and data-analysis techniques to…

Decentralizing Public Engagement

Emerging technologies for citizen participation in local government policy- and decision-making have been limited to two primary forms of engagement: public projects through…


Share now!